|
Introduction
A mammogram is an x-ray exam of the breast. It is used to
detect and evaluate breast abnormalities, both in women who have no
breast complaints or symptoms and in women who have breast symptoms
(problems such as a lump, pain, or nipple discharge). Mammograms are
most often used to look for cancer in women who have no symptoms. These
are called screening mammograms. Those done in
women who have lumps or other symptoms are called diagnostic
mammograms.
Although the use of x-rays to examine the breast was first introduced
more than 90 years ago, modern mammography has only existed since 1969,
when the first dedicated x-ray machines used just for breast imaging
became available. Since then, the technology has advanced a great deal,
so that today's mammogram is very different even from those of the
mid-1980s.
The special type of x-ray machine used for the breasts produces lower
energy x-rays that do not penetrate tissue as easily as that used for
routine chest x-rays or x-rays of the arms or legs, but it does improve
the contrast of the image. Modern mammography also results in a
significantly lower dose of radiation to the breast compared with the
earlier machines.
For a mammogram, the breast is squeezed between 2 plastic plates
attached to the mammogram machine, as shown in the picture below. This
squeezing or compression is needed to spread the tissue apart. It also
ensures that there will be very little movement, that the image is
sharper, and that the exam can be done with a lower x-ray dose.
Although this compression causes discomfort, it only lasts for a few
seconds and is needed to produce a good mammogram. The entire procedure
for a mammogram takes about 20 minutes.

The x-ray machine for mammograms
Mammography produces a black and white image of the breast
tissue on a large sheet of film, which is "read" or interpreted by a
radiologist. Radiologists are doctors who have special training in
diagnosing diseases by looking at images of the inside of the body
produced by x-rays, sound waves, magnetic fields, or other methods.
Other doctors who treat breast diseases may look at the mammogram too.
Reading mammograms is challenging. The appearance of the breast on a
mammogram varies a great deal from woman to woman. And some breast
cancers may produce changes in the mammogram that are hard to notice.
It is very important that the radiologist has the x-ray films from
previous mammograms (not just the report) for comparison. This helps
the doctor find small changes and detect a cancer as early as possible.
Because getting your older films can be difficult, it is best to find a
facility that you are comfortable with and plan to get your regular
mammograms there each year. That way, your prior films are easily
available.
Screening Mammograms
Breast cancer takes years to develop. Early in the disease,
most breast cancers cause no symptoms. When breast cancer is detected
at a localized stage (it hasn’t spread to the lymph nodes), the 5-year
survival rate is 98%. If the cancer has spread to nearby lymph nodes
(regional disease), the rate drops to 84%. If the cancer has spread
(metastasized) to distant organs such as the lungs, bone marrow, liver,
or brain, the 5-year survival rate is 27%.
A screening mammogram is an x-ray exam of the breast in a
woman who has no symptoms. The goal of a screening mammogram is to find
cancer when it is still too small to be felt by a woman or her doctor.
Finding small breast cancers early by a screening mammogram greatly
improves a woman’s chance for successful treatment.
A screening mammogram usually takes 2 x-ray pictures (views)
of each breast. For some patients, more pictures may be needed to
include as much breast tissue as possible.
American Cancer Society
Recommendations for Early Breast Cancer Detection
Women age 40 and older should have a screening
mammogram every year, and should continue to do so for as long as they
are in good health.
- Current evidence supporting mammograms is even stronger
than in the past. In particular, recent evidence has confirmed that
mammograms offer substantial benefit for women in their 40s. Women can
feel confident about the benefits associated with regular mammograms
for finding cancer early. However, mammograms also have limitations. A
mammogram will miss some cancers, and it sometimes leads to follow up
of findings that are not cancer, including biopsies.
- Women should be told about the benefits, limitations, and
potential harms associated with regular screening. While mammograms
will detect most breast cancers, a small percentage will be missed.
Also, sometimes signs on a mammogram that appear abnormal may require a
biopsy (the removal of a sample of tissue to see whether cancer cells
are present) that will turn out not be breast cancer.
In this instance, a
woman has undergone a procedure for an abnormality that wasn’t cancer,
and she has been through a period of anxiety about the possibility of
having breast cancer. However, mammograms, despite their limitations,
remain the most effective and valuable tool for decreasing suffering
and death from breast cancer.
- There is no fixed age at which women should stop getting
mammograms. Mammograms for older women (over age 65) should be based on
the woman’s health and whether or not she has other serious illnesses.
Age alone should not be the reason to stop having regular mammograms.
As long as a woman is in good health and would be a candidate for
treatment, she should continue to have mammograms.
Women in their 20s and 30s should have a clinical
breast exam (CBE) as part of a periodic (regular) health exam by a
health professional preferably every 3 years. After age 40, women
should have a breast exam by a health professional every year.
- CBE is a complement to mammograms and an opportunity for
women and their doctor or nurse to discuss changes in their breasts,
early detection testing, and factors in the woman’s history that might
make her more likely to have breast cancer.
- There may be some benefit in having the CBE shortly before
the mammogram because if the examiner discovers a mass, then the
mammogram can focus on that area of suspicion. The exam should include
instruction for the purpose of helping a woman become familiar with her
own breasts. Women should also be given information about the benefits
and limitations of CBE and BSE (breast self-exam). Breast cancer risk
is very low for women in their 20s and gradually increases with age.
Women should be told to promptly report any new breast symptoms to a
health professional.
BSE is an option for women starting in their 20s.
Women should be told about the benefits and limitations of BSE. Women
should report any breast changes to their health professional right
away.
- Research has shown that BSE plays a small role in finding
breast cancer compared with finding a breast lump by chance or simply
being aware of what is normal for each woman. Some women feel very
comfortable doing BSE regularly (usually monthly) which involves a
systematic step-by-step approach to examining the look and feel of
one’s breasts. Other women are more comfortable simply looking and
feeling their breasts in a less systematic approach, such as while
showering or getting dressed or doing an occasional thorough exam.
Sometimes, women are so concerned about "doing it right" that they
become stressed over the technique. Doing BSE regularly is one way for
women to know how their breasts normally look and feel and to notice
any changes. The goal, with or without BSE, is to report any breast
changes to a doctor or nurse right away.
- Women who choose to do BSE should have their BSE technique
reviewed during their physical exam by a health professional. It is
okay for women to choose not to do BSE or not to do it on a regular
schedule. However, by doing the exam regularly you get to know how your
breasts normally feel and you can more readily detect any signs or
symptoms. If a change occurs, such as a lump or swelling, skin
irritation or dimpling, nipple pain or retraction (turning inward),
redness or scaliness of the nipple or breast skin, a discharge other
than breast milk, or a change in the size of one breast, you should see
your doctor or nurse as soon as possible for evaluation. Remember that
most of the time these breast changes are not cancer.
Women at high risk (greater than 20% lifetime risk)
should get an MRI (magnetic resonance imaging) and a mammogram every
year. Women at moderately
increased risk (15% to 20% lifetime risk) should talk with their
doctors about the benefits and limitations of adding MRI screening to
their yearly mammogram. Yearly MRI screening is not recommended for
women whose lifetime risk of breast cancer is less than 15%.
- Women at high risk include those who:
- have a known BRCA1 or BRCA2 gene mutation
- have a first-degree relative (mother, father, brother,
sister, or child) with a BRCA1 or BRCA2 gene mutation, and have not had
genetic testing themselves
- have a lifetime risk of breast cancer of 20%-25% or
greater, according to risk assessment tools that are based mainly on
family history
- had radiation therapy to the chest when they were
between the ages of 10 and 30 years
- have a genetic disease such as Li-Fraumeni syndrome,
Cowden syndrome, or
Bannayan-Riley-Ruvalcaba syndrome, or have one of these syndromes in
first-degree relatives
- Women at moderately increased risk include those who:
- have a lifetime risk of breast cancer of 15%-20%,
according to risk assessment tools that are based mainly on family
history
- have a personal history of breast cancer, ductal
carcinoma in situ (DCIS), lobular carcinoma in situ (LCIS), atypical
ductal hyperplasia (ADH), or atypical lobular hyperplasia (ALH)
- have extremely dense breasts or unevenly dense breasts
when viewed by mammograms
- If MRI is used, it should be in addition to, not instead
of, a screening mammogram. This is because while an MRI is a more
sensitive test (it's more likely to detect cancer than a mammogram), it
may still miss some cancers that a mammogram would detect.
- For most women at high risk, screening with MRI and
mammograms should begin at age 30 years and continue for as long as a
woman is in good health. But because the evidence is limited regarding
the best age at which to start screening, this decision should be based
on shared decision making between patients and their health care
providers, taking into account personal circumstances and preferences.
- Several risk assessment tools, with names such as BRCAPRO,
the Claus model, and the Tyrer-Cuzick model, are available to help
health professionals estimate a woman's breast cancer risk. These tools
give approximate, rather than precise, estimates of breast cancer risk
based on different combinations of risk factors and different data
sets. As a result, they may give different risk estimates for the same
woman. Their results should be discussed by a woman and her doctor when
being used to decide on whether to start MRI screening.
- It is recommended that women who get screening MRI do so at
a facility that can do an MRI-guided breast biopsy at the same time if
needed. Otherwise, the woman will have to have a second MRI exam at
another facility at the time of biopsy.
- There is no evidence at this time that MRI will be an
effective screening tool for women at average risk. While MRI is more
sensitive than mammograms, it also has a higher false-positive rate
(where the test finds things that turn out to not be cancer), which
would result in unneeded biopsies and other tests in a large portion of
these women.
The American Cancer Society believes the use of regular
mammograms, MRI (in women at high risk), clinical breast exams, and
finding and reporting breast changes early, according to the
recommendations outlined above, offers women the best chance for
reducing the breast cancer death rate through early detection. This
combined approach is clearly better than any one test. Without
question, breast physical exam without mammograms would miss many
breast cancers that are too small for a woman or her doctor to feel but
can be seen on mammograms. Although a mammogram is a sensitive
screening method, a small percentage of breast cancers do not show up
on mammograms but can be felt by a woman or her doctor. For women at
high risk of breast cancer, such as those with BRCA gene mutations or a
strong family history, both MRI and mammogram exams of the breast are
recommended.
Diagnostic Mammograms
A diagnostic mammogram is an x-ray exam of the breast in a
woman who either has a breast complaint (for example, a breast mass,
nipple discharge, etc.) or has had something abnormal found during a
screening mammogram. During a diagnostic mammogram, more pictures are
taken to carefully study the area of concern. In most cases, special
images involve magnification
to make a small area of suspicious breast tissue easier to evaluate.
Many other types of x-ray pictures can be done, depending on the type
of problem and its location in the breast.
For example, a diagnostic mammogram may show that an area
that appeared to be abnormal actually was quite normal on closer exam,
and the woman can then return to routine yearly screening.
It also could show that an area of abnormal tissue has a high
likelihood of not being cancer (being benign). For this, it is common
to ask the woman to return to be rechecked, usually in 4 to 6 months.
Finally, the diagnostic work-up may suggest that a biopsy is
needed to tell whether or not the abnormal area is cancer. If your
doctor recommends that you have a biopsy, it does not mean that you
have cancer. About 80% of all breast changes that are biopsied are
found to be benign (not cancerous) when looked at under the microscope.
If a biopsy is needed, you should discuss the different types of biopsy
(see below) with your doctor to decide which method of biopsy is best
for you.
Tips for Having a Mammogram
The following are useful suggestions for ensuring that you
will receive a good quality mammogram:
- If it is not posted in a place you can see it (often near
the receptionist’s desk), ask to see the FDA certificate that is issued
to all facilities that offer mammography. The FDA requires that all
facilities meet high professional standards of safety and quality in
order to provide mammography services. Without certification, a
facility may not provide mammography.
- Use a facility that either specializes in mammography or
does many mammograms a day.
- If you are satisfied that the facility is of high quality,
continue to go there on a regular basis so that your mammograms can be
compared from year to year.
- If you are going to a facility for the first time, bring a
list of the places, dates of mammograms, biopsies, or other breast
treatments you have had before.
- If you have had mammograms at another facility, you should
make every attempt to get those mammograms to bring with you to the new
facility (or have them sent there) so that they can be compared to the
new ones.
- On the day of the exam, don’t wear deodorant or
antiperspirant. Some of these contain substances that can interfere
with the reading of the mammogram by appearing on the x-ray film as
white spots.
- You may find it more convenient to wear a skirt or pants,
so that you’ll only need to remove your blouse for the exam.
- Schedule your mammogram when your breasts are not tender
or swollen to help reduce discomfort and to assure a good picture. Try
to avoid the week just before your period.
- Always describe any breast symptoms or problems that you
are having to the technologist who is doing the mammogram. Be prepared
to describe any related medical history such as prior surgeries,
hormone use, and any breast cancer that you or a family member has had.
Also discuss any new findings or problems in your breasts with your
doctor or nurse before having a mammogram.
- Before having any type of imaging test, tell your radiology
technologist if you are breastfeeding or if you think you might be
pregnant.
- If you do not hear from your doctor within 30 days, do not
assume that your mammogram was normal -- call your doctor or the
facility.
What to Expect When You Get a
Mammogram
- Having a mammogram requires that you undress above the
waist. The facility will provide a wrap for you to wear.
- A technologist will position your breasts
for the mammogram. Most technologists are women. You and the
technologist are the only ones in the room during the mammogram.
- The whole procedure takes about 20 minutes. The actual
breast compression only lasts a few seconds.
- You will feel discomfort when your breasts are
compressed, and for some women compression can be painful. Try not to
schedule a mammogram when your breasts are likely to be tender, as they
may be just before or during your period.
- All mammogram facilities are now required to send your
results to you within 30 days. Generally, you will be contacted within
5 working days if there is a problem with the mammogram.
- Only 2 to 4 screening mammograms of every 1,000 lead to a
diagnosis of cancer. About 10% of women who have a mammogram will
require more tests, but most will only need another mammogram. Don't
panic if this happens to you. Only 8% to 10% of those women will need a
biopsy, and most (80%) of those biopsies will not be cancer.
If you are a woman and age 40 or over, you should get a
mammogram every year. You can schedule the next one while you're there
at the facility. Or you can ask for a reminder to schedule it as the
date gets closer. Some women schedule the next year's mammogram and ask
to be reminded of the appointment a few weeks ahead of time.
Help With Mammogram Costs
Medicare, Medicaid, and most private health insurance plans
cover mammogram costs, or at least part of them. Low-cost mammograms
are
available in most communities. Call the American Cancer Society at
1-800-ACS-2345 (1-800-227-2345) for information about facilities in
your area. In addition, the National Breast and Cervical Cancer Early
Detection Program (NBCCEDP) provides breast and cervical cancer early
detection testing to women without health insurance for free or at very
little cost. To learn more about this program, please contact the
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) at 1-888-842-6355 or
on the Internet at www.cdc.gov/cancer/nbccedp/.
Regulation of Mammography
In the United States, mammography is highly regulated.
Although the quality of mammography has improved since its introduction
in 1969, studies in the mid-1980s showed that quality varied greatly
from place to place. In an attempt to educate those working with
mammography, improve quality, and lower the dose of radiation, the
American Cancer Society approached the American College of Radiology
(ACR) and requested that it establish standards and criteria that would
help women and doctors find those facilities that provided high quality
screening services. In 1986, the ACR started the first national
Mammography Accreditation Program (MAP). This voluntary program raised
standards nationwide and led to better mammography at those sites that
took part in the program.
In 1992, Congress passed a law to apply similar standards at
all mammography facilities. The standards are no longer voluntary, and
today the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) must certify each
mammography facility (except those of the Department of Veterans
Affairs). In order to be certified, the equipment, personnel, and
practice of the facility must be reviewed by an FDA-approved
accreditation body and meet the following criteria:
- Each mammogram machine has to be accredited.
- Certain staff members must meet strict standards
including:
- radiologists (the doctors who
interpret the
mammograms)
- radiologic technologists (those
who actually
position women for the exam and take the mammogram pictures)
- medical physicists (professionals
who specialize in
medical equipment and image production)
- Typical x-rays are reviewed for quality and information on
radiation dose, which is required to be very low.
If the facility meets all of the required standards, the
FDA gives its certification. These standards are outlined in the
Mammography Quality Standards Act (MQSA), which has been in effect
since 1994. It is unlawful to perform mammograms in the United States
without an FDA certificate.
The FDA has a list of all of its certified mammography
facilities by state and zip code. This list is available at the FDA's
Web site: http://www.fda.gov/cdrh/mammography.
Reporting Results
Mammogram clinics are now required to notify women in writing
about the results of their mammograms. The Mammography Quality
Standards Act, under FDA regulation, was recently changed in response
to reports that some women may not have learned soon enough that they
had suspicious mammograms. Mammogram clinics are continuing to report
mammogram results to the woman's doctor, who is responsible for
ordering additional tests or treatments. A newer part of the regulation
requires clinics to mail women a separate, easy-to-understand report of
their mammogram results within 30 days -- sooner if the mammogram
results suggest cancer is present -- so that the woman knows the
results even if her doctor has not yet called to tell her.
Radiation Exposure From Mammograms
The modern mammography machine produces breast x-rays that are high in
image quality but uses a low radiation dose (usually about 0.1 to 0.2
rads per picture). In the past there were concerns about radiation
risks. Today if there is a risk, it is very small.
Strict guidelines are in place to ensure that mammography equipment is
safe and uses the lowest dose of radiation possible. Many people are
concerned about the exposure to x-rays, but the level of radiation in
modern mammography does not significantly increase the risk for breast
cancer.
To put dose into perspective, if a woman with breast cancer is treated
with radiation, she will likely receive a total of around 5,000 rads (a
rad is a measure of radiation dose). If she has yearly mammograms
beginning at age 40 and continues until she is 90, she will have
received 20 to 40 rads. To put it another way, the dose of radiation
that you get during a screening mammogram is about the same amount of
radiation from your natural surroundings (background radiation) you
would average in a 3-month period.
What Does the Doctor Look for
on Your Mammogram?
The doctor reading your films will look for several types of
changes:
Calcifications are tiny mineral deposits
within the breast tissue, which look like small white spots on the
films. They may or may not be caused by cancer. There are 2 types of
calcifications:
- Macrocalcifications are coarse (larger)
calcium deposits that are most likely changes in the breasts caused by
aging of the breast arteries, old injuries, or inflammation. These
deposits are related to non-cancerous conditions and do not require a
biopsy. Macrocalcifications are found in about half the women over 50,
and in 1 of 10 women under 50.
- Microcalcifications are tiny specks of
calcium in the breast. They may appear alone or in clusters.
Microcalcifications seen on a mammogram are more a cause for concern,
but still usually do not mean that cancer is present. The shape and
layout
of microcalcifications help the radiologist judge how likely it is that
cancer is present. In most instances, the presence of
microcalcifications does not mean a biopsy is needed. In other cases,
the microcalcifications look more suspicious and a biopsy is needed.
A mass, which may occur with or without
calcifications, is another important change seen on mammograms. Masses
can be many things, including cysts (non-cancerous,
fluid-filled sacs) and non-cancerous solid tumors (such as
fibroadenomas), but they could be cancer and usually should be biopsied
if they are not cysts.
- A cyst
cannot be diagnosed by physical
exam alone, nor can it be diagnosed by a mammogram alone. To confirm
that a mass is really a cyst, either breast ultrasound or removal of
fluid with a thin, hollow needle (aspiration) is needed.
- If a mass is not a simple cyst (that is, if it is at least
partly solid),
then you may need to have more
imaging tests. Some masses can be watched with regular mammograms,
while others may need a biopsy. The size, shape, and margins (edges) of
the mass help the radiologist to determine whether cancer may be
present.
Your prior mammograms may help show that a mass has not
changed for many years, which would mean that the mass is likely a
benign condition and a biopsy would not be needed. Having your prior
mammograms available to the radiologist, as discussed above, is very
important.
A mammogram may show something suspicious, but by itself it
cannot prove that an abnormal area is cancer. If a mammogram raises a
suspicion of cancer, tissue must be removed and looked at under the
microscope to tell if it is cancer. This can be done with a needle
biopsy or an open surgical biopsy (described below).
Mammogram Reports (BIRADS)
The American College of Radiology (ACR) has developed a
standard way of describing mammogram findings. In this system, the
results are given a code (numbered 0 through 6). This system is called
the Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BIRADS). Having a
standard way of reporting mammogram results lets doctors use a
consistent language and ensures better follow up of suspicious
findings.
Assessment Is Incomplete
Category 0: Additional Imaging Evaluation and/or
Comparison to Prior Mammograms Is Needed.
A possible abnormality may not be completely seen or defined
and will need more tests, such as the use of spot compression,
magnification views, special mammogram views, or ultrasound.
Assessment Is Complete
Category 1: Negative
In this case, there is no significant abnormality to report.
The breasts look the same (symmetrical) with no masses, distorted
structures, or suspicious calcifications.
Category 2: Benign (Non-cancerous) Finding
This is also a negative mammogram, but the reporting doctor
chooses to describe a finding known to be benign, such as benign
calcifications, intramammary lymph nodes, or calcified fibroadenomas.
This ensures that others who look at the mammogram will not
misinterpret this benign finding as suspicious. This finding is
recorded in the mammogram report for use in future mammogram
assessments.
Category 3: Probably Benign Finding – Follow-up in a
Short Time Frame Is Suggested
The findings placed in this category have a very good chance
(greater than 98%) of being benign. The findings are not expected to
change over a period of follow-up. Since it is not proven benign, it is
helpful to see if an area of concern changes over time. Follow-up with
repeat imaging is usually done in 6 months and regularly thereafter
until the finding is known to be stable (usually at least 2 years).
This approach helps avoid unnecessary biopsies but allows for early
diagnosis of a cancer should the suspicious area change over time.
Category 4: Suspicious Abnormality – Biopsy Should
Be Considered
Findings do not definitely look like cancer but could be
cancer. The radiologist is concerned enough to recommend a biopsy. The
findings in this category can have a wide range of suspicion levels.
For this reason, some doctors may divide this category further:
- 4A: finding with a low suspicion of being cancerous
- 4B: finding with an intermediate suspicion of being
cancerous
- 4C: finding of moderate concern of being cancerous, but
not as high as Category 5
Not all doctors use the subdivisions, however.
Category 5: Highly Suggestive of Malignancy –
Appropriate Action Should Be Taken
The findings look like cancer and have a high probability (at
least 95%) of being cancer. Biopsy is very strongly recommended.
Category 6: Known Biopsy-Proven Malignancy –
Appropriate Action Should Be Taken
This category is only used for findings on a mammogram that
have already been determined to be cancerous by a previous biopsy.
Imaging-Guided Breast Biopsy
A suspicious area in the breast may be found by physical exam,
mammogram or another imaging method, or by some combination of these.
But regardless of how it was found, cancer can only be confirmed by a biopsy, in which a
sample of cells or tissue is removed and looked at under the
microscope. For suspicious areas that cannot be felt (and even for some
that can), imaging tests may be done to be sure the right area is
biopsied. There are several types of biopsies now available.
Surgical Biopsy
For years, excisional (surgical) biopsy was a
woman's only option for this procedure. In this type of biopsy, the
surgeon makes an incision in the skin of the breast and removes the
entire abnormal area (lesion) together with a narrow zone of the
surrounding normal tissue (called the margin). It may leave a scar at
the incision site.
Wire localization is a procedure used to guide a
surgical (excisional) breast biopsy of a small mass that would be hard
for the surgeon to locate. It can also be useful with areas that look
suspicious on the x-ray (due to calcifications, for example) but do not
have a distinct lump. After numbing the area with local anesthetic
(drug to numb the skin), a hollow needle (thinner than those used for
drawing blood) is placed into the breast. X-rays are used to guide the
needle to the suspicious area. A thin wire is then inserted through the
center of the needle. A small hook at the end of the wire keeps it in
place. The hollow needle is then removed. The surgeon uses the wire as
a guide to locate the abnormal area to be removed.
Needle Biopsy
Many suspicious breast abnormalities can now be diagnosed
without surgery by using needle biopsy. There are 2
types of needle biopsies:
- Fine needle aspiration (FNA) biopsy uses
a very thin, hollow needle to remove fluid and tiny fragments of
tissue.
- Core needle biopsy (CNB) uses a slightly
larger needle to remove a piece of tissue about 1/16-inch in diameter
and ½ inch long.
Usually several samples are taken with either of these
techniques.
If the breast mass is large enough to feel, the doctor can do
a needle biopsy by directly guiding the needle into the lump.
If the mass is too small or too deep within the breast to be
felt, biopsies are done using breast imaging methods to guide the
needle into the lesion. For example, ultrasound
imaging can be used so that the doctor can see the needle on a screen
as it moves toward and into the mass.
Another method called stereotactic needle biopsy
is useful in cases in which calcifications or a mass can be seen on
mammogram but cannot be felt. Based on mammograms taken from 2 angles,
computerized equipment maps the exact location of the mass or
calcifications and guides the placement of the needle for CNB or, less
often, FNA biopsy.
A stereotactic core needle biopsy can
sample breast changes felt by the doctor, as well as smaller ones
pinpointed by ultrasound or mammogram. Depending on whether the
abnormal area can be felt, about 3 to 5 cores are usually removed.
The needle used in core biopsies is larger than that used in
FNA. It removes a small cylinder of tissue (about 1/16- to 1/8-inch in
diameter and ½-inch long) from a breast abnormality. The biopsy is done
with local anesthesia (drugs are used to make the area numb) in an
outpatient setting.
Two stereotactic biopsy methods can remove more tissue than a core
biopsy. The Mammotome® is also known as vacuum-assisted biopsy.
For this procedure the skin is numbed and a small incision (about
¼-inch) is made. A probe is inserted through the incision into the
abnormal area of breast tissue. A cylinder of tissue is suctioned into
the probe then a rotating knife within the probe cuts the tissue sample
from the rest of the breast. The Mammotome procedure is done as an
outpatient. No stitches are needed and there is minimal scarring. This
method usually removes about twice as much tissue as core biopsies. The
ABBI method (short for Advanced Breast Biopsy Instrument) uses a probe
with a rotating circular knife and thin heated electrical wire to
remove a large cylinder of abnormal tissue.
In some centers, the biopsy is guided by an MRI, which locates the
tumors, plots its coordinates, and aims the stereotactic biopsy device
into the tumor.
A biopsy technique known as ATEC now makes it possible to obtain tissue
samples during a vacuum-assisted breast biopsy with magnetic resonance
imaging (MRI)-assisted guidance. As with other vacuum-assisted
biopsies, this method allows many samples to be taken through a single
small incision in the skin, using only local anesthesia (numbing of the
area). This technique is being studied in women with a personal or
family history of breast cancer, those who have undergone previous
breast surgery, and women with dense breast tissue who cannot get
accurate screenings with tests such as ultrasound or mammograms.
The accuracy rates for the different types of biopsy techniques seem to
be similar, although the accuracy of each method depends largely on the
doctor's experience with that method. This is especially true with
methods that remove smaller amounts of tissue (FNA and core needle
biopsy) because these require more accurate placement of the needle.
Each type of biopsy has advantages and disadvantages. The choice of
which to use depends on each patient's situation and needs. Some of the
factors to consider include how suspicious the lesion appears, how
large it is, where in the breast it is located, how many lesions are
present, other medical problems the patient may have, and her personal
preferences. Women are encouraged to discuss the pros and cons of
different biopsy types with their doctors, and to have the procedure
done by a doctor experienced in the chosen technique.
Mammograms in Special
Circumstances
Mammograms in Younger Women
Mammography is a greater challenge in younger women, usually because
their breasts are dense and this can hide a tumor. Since most breast
cancers occur in older women, this is usually not a problem, and
mammography is not recommended for average-risk women under age 40.
In younger women who are at high risk for developing breast cancer (due
to a BRCA1 or BRCA2 gene mutation, a strong family history, or other
factors), yearly breast MRIs and mammograms are recommended. For most
of these women, screening should begin at age 30 years and continue for
as long as the woman is in good health. But because the evidence is
limited regarding the best age at which to start screening, this
decision should be based on shared decision making between patients and
their health care providers, taking into account personal circumstances
and preferences.
Mammograms After Breast-Conserving
Treatment
Removing the entire breast (mastectomy) is one way of treating breast
cancers. Most breast cancers can now be treated just as effectively by
breast-conserving treatment (BCT), without removing the entire breast.
Lumpectomy, one type of BCT, involves removing a cancerous lump and a
narrow margin of the surrounding benign breast tissue. Lumpectomy is
almost always combined with radiation treatment.
A woman who has had BCT will need to continue having mammograms of the
affected breast and her opposite breast.
Most radiologists recommend that patients have a mammogram of the
treated breast 6 months after radiation treatment is finished.
Radiation and chemotherapy both cause changes in the skin and breast
tissues that show up on the mammogram, making it harder to read. These
changes usually peak 6 months after the radiation is completed; the
mammogram at this time establishes a new baseline for the affected
breast for that woman. Future mammograms will be compared to this exam
to follow healing and check for recurrence. The next exam is then 6
months later when the woman is due for her yearly mammogram of both
breasts. Experts differ on the best follow-up plan from this point on.
Some prefer a mammogram of the treated breast every 6 months for 2 to 3
years; others suggest that yearly mammograms are adequate. Each woman
should talk with her doctor about the plan that is best for her.
Mammograms After Mastectomy (Without
Breast Reconstruction)
Women who have had total, modified radical, or radical mastectomy for
breast cancer need no further routine screening mammograms of the
affected side (or sides, if both breasts are removed).
Modified radical mastectomy removes the breast, skin,
nipple, areola, and most of the lymph nodes under the arm on the same
side, leaving the chest muscles intact.
Partial or segmental
mastectomy removes less than the whole breast, taking only
the part of the breast where the cancer was found, along with a margin
of healthy breast tissue around the tumor.
Radical mastectomy is surgery for breast cancer in which
the breast, chest muscles, and all of the lymph nodes under the arm are
moved. This surgery is rarely used now, and is reserved mainly for when
the cancer has spread to the chest muscles. Mammograms are usually
continued for the unaffected breast each year. This is very important,
since women who have had one breast cancer are at higher risk of
developing a new cancer of the other breast.
One type of mastectomy that does require a follow-up mammogram is the
subcutaneous mastectomy. In this operation, the woman keeps her nipple
and the tissue just under the skin. Enough breast tissue is left behind
to require yearly screening mammography in these patients. Any woman
who is not sure what type of mastectomy she has had should ask her
doctor.
Mammograms After Mastectomy (With Breast
Reconstruction)
Women who have had a breast removed by total, modified radical, or
radical mastectomy and reconstructed (rebuilt) with silicone gel or
saline implants do not need routine mammograms. If the woman has had
subcutaneous mastectomy (discussed above), yearly mammograms are still
needed.
After mastectomy, some women choose to have a breast reconstructed
using tissue from their own bodies, most often the stomach (abdomen)
area. This type of reconstruction is called a TRAM (transverse rectus
abdominis myocutaneous) flap reconstruction. A patient who has had
complete (not subcutaneous) mastectomy followed by TRAM flap
reconstruction needs no further screening mammograms on the affected
side. If there is an area of the TRAM flap that is of concern on the
physical exam, a diagnostic mammogram may be obtained. Further imaging
with ultrasound or MRI may also be helpful.
Mammograms After Breast Enlargement With
Implants
Women who have implants are a special challenge for mammography
screening. The x-rays used for imaging the breasts cannot penetrate
silicone or saline implants well enough to show the breast tissue that
is over or under it. Therefore, some breast tissue covered up by the
implant will not be seen on the mammogram.
In order to see as much breast tissue as possible, women with implants
have 4 extra films (2 on each side) as well as the 4 standard images
taken during a screening mammogram. In these additional x-ray pictures,
called implant displacement (ID) views, the implant is pushed back
against the chest wall and the breast is pulled forward over it. This
allows better imaging of the forward most part of each breast. The
implant displacement views are not as successful in women who have had
hard scar tissue form around the implants (contractures). They are
easiest to take in women whose implants are placed underneath (behind)
the chest muscle.
While the number of pictures taken for each exam is greater, the
guidelines for how often women with implants should have screening
mammograms are the same as for women without them.
Although a ruptured (burst) implant can sometimes be diagnosed on a
mammogram, often a ruptured implant will look normal. Magnetic
resonance imaging (MRI), on the other hand, is extremely accurate in
detecting implant rupture. MRI is the best imaging method to check the
implant itself, while mammography is still the best test for evaluating
breast tissue. See the section, "Other Breast Imaging Tests" in this
document for more information on MRI.
Very rarely, mammography can cause an implant to rupture, so it is
important to tell the technologist if you have implants.
Attempts to Improve Mammography
While mammography is an excellent way to find most breast cancers at
their earliest and most curable stage, it does not detect all breast
cancers. Newer techniques may help make mammography more accurate.
Digital Mammograms
Digital mammography (also known as full-field
digital mammography or FFDM) is similar to
standard mammography in that x-rays are used to produce an image of the
breast. The differences are in the way the image is recorded, looked at
by the doctor, and stored. Standard mammogram images are recorded on
large sheets of photographic film, whereas digital images are captured
electronically and viewed on a computer screen. They are stored on a
computer, so that their magnification, brightness, or contrast can be
changed after the exam is done to help the doctor see certain areas
more clearly. Digital images can be transmitted electronically from one
location to another for remote consultation with breast specialists.
While many centers do not offer the digital option at this time, it is
expected to become more widely available in the future.
Because digital mammograms cost more than standard mammograms, studies
are now under way to find out which form of mammogram will help more
women in the long run. Some studies have found that women who have FFDM
have to return less often for extra imaging tests because of
questionable areas on the original mammogram. A recent large study from
the National Cancer Institute found that FFDM was more accurate in
finding cancers in women younger than 50 and in women with dense breast
tissue, although the rates of uncertain (inconclusive) results were
similar between FFDM and film mammography. It is important to remember
that standard film mammography also is effective for these groups of
women, and that they should still get their regular mammogram if
digital mammography is not available.
Computer-aided Detection and Diagnosis
(CAD)
Over the past 2 decades, computer-aided detection and diagnosis (CAD)
has been developed to help radiologists find suspicious areas on
mammograms. This is done most commonly with screen-film mammograms and
less often with digital mammograms.
Computers can help doctors find abnormal areas on a mammogram by acting
as a second set of "eyes." For standard mammograms, the film is fed
into a machine, which converts the image into a digital signal that is
then analyzed by the computer. The technology can also be applied to an
image captured with digital mammography. The computer then displays the
image on a video screen, with markers pointing to areas it "thinks" the
radiologist should check more closely. The M1000 Image Checker is one
such device that has been approved by the US Food and Drug
Administration (FDA) for use in reviewing mammograms.
Early tests have found that CAD can help find some cancers that doctors
might have otherwise missed. But doctors still disagree about how many
cancers the device will pick up. Some doctors feel that the device is
not as effective as simply having a second radiologist review the
films. Others are concerned that the device may lead to unnecessary
biopsies by falsely identifying benign changes as being suspicious for
cancer. Most breast specialists are encouraged by recent progress in
computer-aided detection, and look forward to more technical
refinements and studies that help to clarify its role in breast cancer
detection.
Other Breast Imaging Tests
While mammography is still considered the most useful test for
screening and early detection of breast cancer, other imaging tests may
be helpful in certain situations.
Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI)
For certain women at high risk for breast cancer, screening MRI is
recommended along with a yearly mammogram. MRI is not generally
recommended as a screening tool by itself, as it may miss some cancers
that mammography would detect.
MRI uses magnets and radio waves instead of x-rays to produce very
detailed, cross-sectional images of the body. The most useful MRI exams
for breast imaging use a contrast material (gadolinium DTPA) that is
injected into a small vein in the arm before or during the exam. This
improves the ability of the MRI to clearly show breast tissue details.
While MRI is more sensitive in detecting cancers than mammograms, it
also has a higher false-positive rate (where the test finds something
that turns out not to be cancer), which results in more call-backs and
biopsies. This is why it is not recommended as a screening test for
women at average risk of breast cancer. It would result in unneeded
biopsies and other tests in a large portion of these women.
Just as mammography uses x-ray machines designed especially to image
the breasts, breast MRI also requires special equipment. Higher quality
images are produced by dedicated breast MRI equipment than by machines
designed for head, chest, or abdominal MRI scanning. However, many
hospitals and imaging centers do not have dedicated breast MRI
equipment available. It is also important that screening MRIs are done
at facilities that can do an MRI-guided breast biopsy at the time of
the exam if anything abnormal is found. Otherwise, the scan will need
to be repeated at another facility at the time of the biopsy.
MRI is also more expensive than mammography. At this time there are
concerns about costs of high-quality MRI breast screening services for
women at high risk of breast cancer. Most major insurance companies
will likely pay for these screening tests if a woman can be shown to be
at high risk, but it's not yet clear if all companies will. If you and
your doctor decide that you are at 20% to 25% lifetime risk for breast
cancer, you may want to contact your health insurance representative.
Another concern is that many women live in areas that are not near
adequate facilities for MRI breast screening.
In preparing for a breast MRI, you can eat and drink as usual. You will
need to remove clothes with metal parts such as zippers, snaps, or
buttons, and put on a gown or top. Jewelry, hairpins, safety pins, and
anything else made of metal must be removed before entering the MRI
room. The technologist will ask if you have any metal in your body,
such as surgical clips, staples, pacemakers, artificial joints, metal
fragments, tattoos, permanent eyeliner, and so on. Some metal objects
will not cause problems, but others might. Tell the staff before the
scan if you have any allergies, if you have breast implants, or if you
are pregnant or breast-feeding. You may need to have an IV put in for
dye or contrast agent to help outline the structures of the breast. For
the actual MRI, you will lie on your stomach on a padded platform with
spaces for your breasts. You will need to be very still during the
test, which takes around 30 to 45 minutes.
Breast Ultrasound
Ultrasound, also known as sonography, is an imaging method in which
high-frequency sound waves are used to look inside a part of the body.
A handheld instrument placed on the skin transmits the sound waves
through the breast. Echoes from the sound waves are picked up and
translated by a computer into an image that is displayed on a computer
screen. You are not exposed to radiation during this test.
Breast ultrasound is sometimes used to evaluate breast problems that
are found during a screening or diagnostic mammogram or on physical
exam. Breast ultrasound is not routinely used for screening. Some
studies have suggested that ultrasound may be a helpful addition to
mammography when screening women with dense breast tissue (which is
hard to evaluate with a mammogram), but the use of ultrasound instead
of mammograms is not recommended. A large study is currently underway
to evaluate the use of breast ultrasound for screening.
Ultrasound is useful for evaluating some breast masses and is the only
way to tell if a suspicious area is a cyst without placing a needle
into it to remove (aspirate) fluid. Cysts cannot be accurately
diagnosed by physical exam alone. Breast ultrasound may also be used to
help doctors guide a biopsy needle into some breast lesions.
Ultrasound has become a valuable tool to use along with mammograms
because it is widely available, non-invasive, and less expensive than
other options. However, the effectiveness of an ultrasound test depends
on the operator’s level of skill and experience. Although ultrasound is
less sensitive than MRI (that is, it detects fewer tumors), it has the
advantage of being more available and less expensive.
Ductogram (Galactogram)
A ductogram
is a test that is sometimes helpful in determining the cause of a
nipple discharge. In this x-ray procedure, a thin plastic tube is
placed into the opening of a duct in the nipple. A small amount of
contrast material is injected, which outlines the shape of the duct on
an x-ray image and shows whether there is a mass inside the duct.
Ductal lavage and nipple
aspiration are not imaging tests, but they are mentioned
here because of the confusion that sometimes surrounds them.
Ductal lavage is an experimental test developed for women who have no
symptoms of breast cancer but are at very high risk for breast cancer.
It is not a test to screen for or diagnose breast cancer, but it may
help give a more accurate picture of a woman’s risk of developing it.
Ductal lavage can be done in a doctor’s office or an outpatient
facility. An anesthetic cream is applied to numb the nipple area.
Gentle suction is then used to help draw tiny amounts of fluid from the
milk ducts up to the nipple surface. The fluid droplets that appear
help locate the milk ducts' natural openings on the surface of the
nipple. A tiny tube (called a catheter) is then inserted into a milk
duct opening on the nipple. A small amount of anesthetic is infused
into the duct to numb the inside. Saline (salt water) is slowly
delivered through the catheter to gently "rinse" the duct and collect
cells. The ductal fluid is withdrawn through the catheter and placed
into a collection vial. The vial is then sent to a lab, where the cells
are viewed under a microscope.
Ductal lavage is much more useful as a test of cancer risk rather than
as a screening test for cancer. It is not considered appropriate for
women who aren’t at high risk for breast cancer. It is not clear
whether it will ever be a useful tool. The test has not been shown to
detect cancer early, nor have there been any studies to show that this
approach prevents the development of breast cancer or death from breast
cancer. More studies are needed to better define the usefulness of this
test.
Nipple aspiration also looks for abnormal cells from the
ducts, but is much simpler, in that nothing is inserted into the
breast. The device for nipple aspiration uses small cups that are
placed on the woman's breasts. The device warms the breasts, gently
compresses them, and applies light suction to bring nipple fluid to the
surface of the breast. The nipple fluid is then collected and sent to a
lab for analysis. As with ductal lavage, the procedure may be useful as
a test of cancer risk but is not appropriate as a screening test for
cancer. The test has not been shown to detect cancer early, nor have
there been any studies to show that it prevents the development of
breast cancer or death from breast cancer.
Newer and Experimental Breast Imaging
Methods
Research in the field of breast imaging is continuing in order to:
- increase the number of cancers found before they can be
felt by the patient or her doctor
- find cancers even smaller than those now detected by
mammograms
- improve the ability to distinguish benign breast conditions
from breast cancers
These tests all need further study before their usefulness can be
determined.
Nuclear Medicine Studies
Nuclear medicine studies (nuclear scans) involve injecting small
amounts of slightly radioactive substances into the body and using
special cameras to detect where they go. Depending on the substance
injected, different types of abnormalities may be detected. Unlike most
other imaging tests that are based on changes tumors cause in the
body's structure, nuclear medicine scans depend on changes in tissue
metabolism.
Technetium Sestamibi Scan
(Scintimammography)
A compound known as technetium sestamibi has been studied to help
detect breast cancer. This test is marketed under the trade name
Miraluma®. In this procedure, a small amount of
the radioactive
substance is injected into an arm vein. A special camera then records
where radiation builds up in the breasts.
This procedure cannot distinguish cancer from non-cancerous lesions as
accurately as routine mammography, and is not used as a screening test.
Some radiologists believe it is sometimes useful in looking at
suspicious areas found by regular mammograms. However, studies of the
test have yielded varying results. The general consensus is that this
test is less able to detect cancer than mammography, especially when
the tumor is still small and most likely to be curable. For these
reasons, the exact role of this test remains unclear. Current research
is aimed at improving the technology and evaluating its use in specific
situations such as in the dense breasts of younger women.
Positron Emission Tomography (PET)
PET is another type of nuclear medicine study. Like the sestamibi test,
a tiny amount of radioactive substance is injected into an arm vein.
This substance gives off a small amount of radiation that is detected
by a special PET scanner to form an image.
The most commonly used substance in this test is fluorodeoxyglucose
(FDG), which is a type of sugar. It goes to places in the body where
the cells are most active, especially highlighting cancerous tissue.
PET is being used to detect metastatic disease (cancer spread) and has
been successful in that role. The PET scan is not used to screen for
breast cancer because it does not reliably detect tumors smaller than 1
cm (about half an inch), but research is being done to improve the
accuracy of this test.
Electrical Impedance Imaging (T-Scan)
Electrical impedance imaging scans the breast for electrical
conductivity, based on the idea that breast cancer cells conduct
electricity better. It involves passing a very small electrical current
through the body and detecting it on the skin of the breast with a
small probe (similar to an ultrasound probe). The test does not use
radiation or require breast compression.
This test has received FDA approval to be used as a diagnostic aid in
helping classify tumors detected by mammography. However, it has not
undergone enough clinical testing to be used in breast cancer
screening.
Thermography (Thermal Imaging)
Thermography is a way of measuring and mapping the heat on the surface
of the breast with the use of a special heat-sensing camera. It is
based on the idea that the temperature rises in areas with increased
blood flow and metabolism, which could signify a tumor.
Thermography has been around for several decades, and some scientists
are still attempting to improve the technology for use in breast
imaging. However, no study has ever shown that it is an effective
screening tool for the early detection of breast cancer. It should not
be used as a replacement for mammograms.
Newer versions of this test are better able to determine small
temperature differences. They may prove to be more accurate than older
versions, and are now under study to find out if they might be useful
in finding cancer.
Other Experimental Imaging Tests
Some newer techniques are now being studied for breast imaging.
Optical Imaging
This involves either passing light through the breast or reflecting
light off of it and then somehow measuring the light that returns. The
technique does not use radiation and does not require breast
compression. Optical imaging might be useful at some point for
detecting tumors or the blood vessels supplying them.
One example of optical imaging is computed
tomography laser mammography
(CTLM). This test passes a harmless laser light through the breast
tissue and detects large areas of blood vessels that might signify
breast tumors. CTLM is being studied for use along with mammography to
reduce the number of false positive tests. It has not yet been approved
for use by the FDA.
Other experimental techniques now under study include optoacoustic
tomography (sending laser light pulses through the breast
and detecting
the sound waves they cause) and microwave
imaging. These techniques are
still in the earliest stages of research.
The American Cancer Society is happy to address almost any
cancer-related topic. If you have any more questions, please call us at
1-800-ACS-2345 any day, 24 hours a day.
References
American Cancer Society. Cancer Facts & Figures 2008.
Atlanta, Ga: American Cancer Society, 2008.
American College of Radiology. Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System
Atlas: BI-RADSM® Atlas. 2003.
American College of Radiology - Radiology Society of North America.
Safety: Radiation Exposure in X-ray Examinations. Available at: http://www.radiologyinfo.org/en/safety/index.cfm?pg=sfty_xray.
Accessed August 14, 2007.
Baker L. Breast Cancer Detection Demonstration Project: Five year
summary report. CA Cancer J Clin. 1982;32:196-229.
Beahrs OH, et al. Report of the working group to review the NCI-ACS
Breast Cancer Demonstration Project. J Natl Cancer Inst.
1979;62:639-698.
Brown SL, Silverman BG, Berg WA. Rupture of silicone-gel breast
implants: causes, sequelae, and diagnosis. Lancet.
1997;350:1531-1537.
Freeman M. Imaging: New techniques. In: Harris JR, Lippman ME, Morrow
M, Osborne CK, eds. Diseases of the Breast. 3rd ed.
Philadelphia, Pa: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2004:181-198.
Gotzsche PC, Olsen O. Is screening for breast cancer with mammography
justifiable? Lancet. 2000;355:129-134.
Helvie MA. Imaging analysis: Mammography. In: Harris JR, Lippman ME,
Morrow M, Osborne CK, eds. Diseases of the Breast.
3rd ed. Philadelphia, Pa: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins;
2004:103-130.
Margolese RG, Hortobagyi GN, Buchholz TA. Neoplasms of the Breast. In:
Kufe DW, Pollock RE, Weichselbaum RR, Bast RC, Gansler TS, Holland JF,
Frei E, eds. Cancer Medicine. 6th ed. Hamilton,
Ontario: BC Decker; 2003:1879-1972.
Osteen RT. Breast cancer. In: Lenhard RE, Osteen RT, Gansler T, eds. Clinical
Oncology. Atlanta, Ga: American Cancer Society; 2001:251-268.
Pisano ED, Gatsonis C, Hendrick E, et al. Diagnostic performance of
digital versus film mammography for breast-cancer screening. N
Engl J Med. 2005;353:1773-1783.
Saslow D, Boetes C, Burke W, et al for the American Cancer Society
Breast Cancer Advisory Group. American Cancer Society guidelines for
breast screening with MRI as an adjunct to mammography. CA
Cancer J Clin. 2007;57:75-89.
Smith RA, D’Orsi CJ. Screening for breast cancer. In: Harris JR,
Lippman ME, Morrow M, Osborne CK, eds. Diseases of the Breast.
3rd ed. Philadelphia, Pa: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins;
2004:103-130.
Smith RA, Saslow D, Sawyer KA, Burke W, Costanza ME, Evans WP, Foster
RS, Hendrick E, Eyre HJ, Sener S. American Cancer Society guidelines
for breast cancer screening: update 2003. CA Cancer J Clin.
2003;53:141-169.
Tabar L, Vitak B, Tony HH, Yen MF, Duffy SW, Smith RA. Beyond
randomized controlled trials: organized mammographic screening
substantially reduces breast carcinoma mortality. Cancer.
2001;91:1724-1731.
Revised: 09/26/2007
|